KC - Can this possibly be true?

General forum for the UK Keratoconus and self-help group members.

Click on the forum name, General Discussion Forum, above.

Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet

User avatar
craigthornton
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu 30 Mar 2006 6:43 pm

Postby craigthornton » Sat 03 Feb 2007 10:50 pm

Lynn White wrote:OK 20/20 is the American version of our Snellen definition. It really means "normal vision". Our equivilent in metric is 6/6. If you get 6/5 this means you are getting one line better than accepted "normal vision" which any anyone standards is very good!


Lynn


How far down the chart are you meant to be able to read uncorrected to be classed as having normal vision?

User avatar
GarethB
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 4916
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 3:31 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Location: Warwickshire

Postby GarethB » Mon 05 Feb 2007 8:44 am

Craig,

My understanding is if you get 6/6 uncorrected you have normal vision.

Get the smae with corrected vision, then your duff vision is brought back to normal standards.
Gareth

User avatar
Andrew MacLean
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7703
Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other
Location: Scotland

Postby Andrew MacLean » Mon 05 Feb 2007 11:00 am

That is my understanding, too. The problem from the punter's point of view is that we don't know at the outset how far down the chart (what number of lines) we have to read to make this standard. I think that some Snellen Charts have more and some have fewer lines.

But the standard is supposed to be universal. It is not the numbe of lines from the top that matters, but the size of the characters on the 6/6 line

Andrew
Andrew MacLean

User avatar
Sajeev
Forum Stalwart
Forum Stalwart
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu 18 Mar 2004 10:56 pm
Location: London

Postby Sajeev » Mon 05 Feb 2007 2:40 pm

Going away from the "normal" sight calculations. It reminds me that I was reading, on average most people in the UK see less than 20/20, (I am not sure but my educated guess is, that's with counting all age groups). I can't remember where I read it though... it could be one of those "did you know" kind of stats which seem strange at first, but it could just be due to an increase in the aging population that numbers are getting crunched?!

User avatar
piper
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed 25 Oct 2006 2:15 am
Location: Southeastern Louisiana USA

Postby piper » Tue 06 Feb 2007 2:16 am

Wheras it may be THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE to grind an eyeglass lens into such a shape as to be fully corrective, any rotation or movement of the eye will then cause vilsual information to be gathered from a differfent portion of the lens than it was when looking straight forward. Therefore, any lens made will be useable in only one postion of the eye and in normal life this is simply not possible.

Specialists like this may serve to set KC care and understanding back decades......

Piper

User avatar
GarethB
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 4916
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 3:31 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Location: Warwickshire

Postby GarethB » Tue 06 Feb 2007 6:33 pm

Piper,

I beg to differ in that the ability of the brain to compensate need be taken into account.

My RGP can be off by 10 degrees and I can still see down to the same level of the chart. Rotate it another 120 degrees then it moves out of position and I see nothing at all!
Gareth


Return to “General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests