Page 1 of 1
					
				Evidence base required for laughter
				Posted: Fri 15 Jun 2007 2:41 pm
				by Louise Pembroke
				This just came in from a friend, I practically wet myself 
laughing;
"David Oaks was told in Dresden [at the World Psychiatric Association 
conference on coercion) that his clown nose was "dangerous." The reps from 
the drug companies told the organizers that if David put on his clown nose 
they would withdraw their funding from the conference! The rationale was.. 
that this was a supposedly scientific conference and humour was 
unscientific!"
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri 15 Jun 2007 3:38 pm
				by GarethB
				They obveously have never been to a confrence with me and I have presented a few scientific things, considering that is my job!
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri 15 Jun 2007 6:01 pm
				by Louise Pembroke
				A friend owns a book called, 'scientific study of laughter', it's so ironic. I can imagine what Patch Adams would say!
I'd probably be assassinated if I did to them what I did many years ago to drug reps at a conference. Whilst they were out to lunch a few of us defaced their psychiatric drug posters in a universal language as there were too many languages spoken at the conference to write it up. We did nice pictures of hyperdermics with an arrow to the brain with an arrow to a skull and crossbones. They went mad and called the police. We sat there with puppy eyes and claimed the voices told us to do it!
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Sat 16 Jun 2007 7:25 pm
				by Andrew MacLean
				For a moment I found myself back in the 70's, in a coffee bar having an earnest conversation with others approaching degree finals about what we would do next.  
I already  had a place to which to go.  One of my friends had a quota place for a PhD in Social Science (he is now professor of Social Science at one of the UK's most prestigeous univrsities.
Some of the others went into Politics and form part of the current cabinet.  One earnest young woman was going to do some Psych evaluation of humour.  She had found Freud's little treatise on humour and was going to try to develop his assertion that all humour is based on familiarity.
I wonder what she is doing now?  Probably cracking them up at Psych conferences with her re-telling of the "essential joke".
By the way, when I was a University Chaplain, Ed Byrne was one of our undergraduates.
Andrew