microwave treatment

General forum for the UK Keratoconus and self-help group members.

Click on the forum name, General Discussion Forum, above.

Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet

Amer
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed 11 Jun 2008 5:06 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other

microwave treatment

Postby Amer » Sat 04 Jun 2011 9:09 am

Hi people,

Found this on the net, thought the people on here might find it interesting or/ and have more info on it

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes ... -microwave

User avatar
Lynn White
Optometrist
Optometrist
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

Re: microwave treatment

Postby Lynn White » Sun 05 Jun 2011 1:58 pm

Hi Amer,

This is referring to the KeraFlex system and there already several threads on here relating to this surgery. The company website is http://www.avedro.com/kerakxl.html.

However, a word of warning when reading random press releases like this:

News editors have little knowledge or understanding of corneal surgical procedures

Add onto that what they do know is "dumbed down" for their audience because the rest of the world knows even less. The average KC patient knows infinitely more than the average person about corneal conditions and treatments - and probably than most normal medical doctors as well!

All press releases simplify any information into simple one liners to put over information quickly and simply. By definition, they leave out any reference to complex issues - therefore things always seem to be simpler than they really are.

The KeraFlex system was originally designed to correct short sightedness and astigmatism (what the article calls " rugby-ball eye ") and was further developed for keratoconus. The "burst of ultraviolet light" refers to cross linking. The KXL cross linking is a much shorter procedure than "normal" cross linking because they do use a higher energy UV source, reducing the hour long process down to a few minutes... which is where the "burst" of UV light reference comes from.

What no-one really knows is; does that cause any issues with the tissue exposed to it? Is a short burst of high energy better, the same or worse than a longer exposure to a lower energy source? We don't know.

It has taken us over 13 years to realise that CXL may well be as beneficial as we had all hoped. This may look like unnecessary caution but people responsible for public health have to be sure - which is why the final comment is that we don't know the long term effects of this treatment.

Lynn
Lynn White MSc FCOptom
Optometrist Contact Lens Fitter
Clinical Director, UltraVision

email: lynn.white@lwvc.co.uk


Return to “General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests