Amidose & Salines

General forum for the UK Keratoconus and self-help group members.

Click on the forum name, General Discussion Forum, above.

Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet

User avatar
someperson
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue 09 Jan 2007 11:12 pm

Amidose & Salines

Postby someperson » Wed 16 May 2007 5:37 pm

Hello

I am a scleral user.

Is there any real difference between Amidose and the normal salines such as Bausch & Lomb?

I cant really see much difference between these two.

Can normal salines be used to fill up scleral lens?

Thanks

User avatar
Marc Pritchard
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed 09 May 2007 12:12 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Location: East London, for now

Postby Marc Pritchard » Wed 16 May 2007 5:51 pm

Hey Someperson,

I work within recruitment in the Pharmaceutical industry and as part of my role I need to have some technical knowledge.

Bausch & Lomb would be the company that make the solution, and most salines will be the same.

My recomendation is to check the ingredients, if they match then you should be able to use other salines with absolutely no problem.

If they don't then speak to a specialist.

Marc

User avatar
John Smith
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1942
Joined: Thu 08 Jan 2004 12:48 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Sidcup, Kent

Postby John Smith » Wed 16 May 2007 6:00 pm

My understanding on the Amidose and Steripod blue salines is that they are "microfiltered" to remove any tiny particulates that bacteria could grow on.
John

User avatar
Andrew MacLean
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7703
Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other
Location: Scotland

Postby Andrew MacLean » Wed 16 May 2007 6:34 pm

For what it's worth, when I wore a scleral I used the preservative free saline solution that I got at out local Tesco. In fact, this was what was recommended by the hospital :D

Andrew
Andrew MacLean

User avatar
GarethB
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 4916
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 3:31 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Location: Warwickshire

Postby GarethB » Wed 16 May 2007 7:18 pm

There are often subtle differences such as ratio of ingredients, so you read the packaging and they have the same stuff in but the amounts differ.

Then there is those with preservatives and preservative free.

Some are sterilised by filtration, others chemically and so on.

Baush and Lomb Sensitive Eyes Plus saline is the only one I do not have an adverse reaction too.
Gareth

User avatar
someperson
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue 09 Jan 2007 11:12 pm

Postby someperson » Wed 16 May 2007 11:54 pm

So on days when I run out of Amidose using normal saline like Bausch & Lomb can do the job and be used as an alternative?

It seems hard to make sense of the indgredients and by the sounds of it, it depends on the individual persons tolerance aswell.

How come there seems to be such a difference in price then if there is little difference?

Thanks alot for the replies.

User avatar
GarethB
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 4916
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 3:31 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Location: Warwickshire

Postby GarethB » Thu 17 May 2007 7:29 am

Price differences are usually down to Branding and volume of saline in a bottle.

Before I found the type saline ahd an affect on my eyes I went for what ever was cheapest per 100 ml.

Sometimes getting a couple 250 ml bottles was overall chaeper than one 400ml bottle.
Gareth

User avatar
rosemary johnson
Champion
Champion
Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004 8:42 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Contact lenses
Location: East London, UK

Postby rosemary johnson » Mon 28 May 2007 7:46 pm

I wear sclerals and have both one of the big bottles = "ordinary" saline???? - and amidose tubes.

Advantages of the big bottles@
- sit beside kitchen sink and are always handy, don't keep running out and have to find a new one without lenses early inthe morning
- easy to find - big white bottle - and don't get dropped on floor and lost easily

Disafvantages of the big bottles:
- too ig and heavy to pp one in my handbag when going out somewhere
- because big and heavy and you have to tip them over a long way, it is very easy to splash saline all over the place and end up using far more of it than really necessary. That is, uneconomical in terms of volume used

Advantages of Amidose:
- handy little tubes to pop in handbag and small enough to fit into rules for flying these days
- easier to use just as much as you need and not spash about
- sterile until you open each tube - you've only got about a week's supply open and vulnerable to going off at once, whereas the big bottles have a whole big bottle opened at once

Disadvantages of Amidose:
- little tues keep running out and you have to keep fishing out a new one
- need scissors/knife to cut the tips off - problem if flying.
- hard to see the little tubes without the lenses in and they keep getting knocked off the ironing board onto kitchen floor, or lost in bottom of handbag
- for mee, too "strong" and sting slightly - compared to what I used before and still miss: K-Lens. OK, those who remember the K0Lens afficionados can all laugh here!

Rosemary


Return to “General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests