Five(ish) months post graft update

General forum for the UK Keratoconus and self-help group members.

Click on the forum name, General Discussion Forum, above.

Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet

User avatar
Paul Osborne
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005 9:54 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Canterbury, Kent

Five(ish) months post graft update

Postby Paul Osborne » Thu 03 Aug 2006 4:32 pm

Hi!

Have been back for another followup appointment today.

Vision is good apart from some ghosting, can manage five lines on the snellen in the grafted eye with pinholes.

Consultant is happy and says that the graft is going very well and that next time we will probably be thinking about suture removal.

Have to return in three months time and continue on the Maxidex once a day until then.

So things are good on the eye.

I do now have an amazing photo where you can see the loops of the stitches and the knots, once I can extract it from the wifes PC I will bung it on the web and post a link here - its humoungous so don't want to upset John. :-)

Life is good just incredibly busy, so sorry I haven't been around for a while.

Anyway take care folks and I will attempt to appear more frequently, and no I won't forget the picture.

Paul

User avatar
GarethB
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 4916
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 3:31 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Location: Warwickshire

Postby GarethB » Fri 04 Aug 2006 8:34 pm

It amazes me how long everyone is on the steroids post graft!

20 years ago I was only on them for 3 months, now it seems the going rate is at least 9!

Anyone know the reason why?
Gareth

User avatar
John Smith
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1941
Joined: Thu 08 Jan 2004 12:48 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Sidcup, Kent

Postby John Smith » Fri 04 Aug 2006 9:22 pm

Paul,

Yes please; do post the pic - it would be very interesting I'm sure.

I agree Gareth - I'm still on the steroids following my first graft in 2002. Unfortunately, I'm still on them because of rejection episodes. It'll be interesting to see how I go with the DALK graft next week :?
John

User avatar
Paul Osborne
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005 9:54 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Canterbury, Kent

Postby Paul Osborne » Tue 08 Aug 2006 8:17 am

OK heres the link:

http://www.paosborne.com/images/eye-closeup.jpg

It is not that humoungous now I have cropped it right down to chop off my eyebrow and fingers.

:-)

Sorry if it is not quite in focus, though it isn't bad considering it was taken with a compact cam as an experiment with the macro mode. Took about four goes to get that - used one hand to force eye open in bright sunlight and held the camera around 6-7 cms away waited for it to auto focus (manual focusing was not an option :-) ) and hit the button.

Cheers

Paul

User avatar
jayuk
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 2148
Joined: Sun 21 Mar 2004 1:50 pm
Location: London / Manchester / Cheshire

Postby jayuk » Tue 08 Aug 2006 8:37 am

That is cool!! One of the best pics ive seen post graft to be honest

What did you use to take it?.....
KC is about facing the challenges it creates rather than accepting the problems it generates -
(C) Copyright 2005 KP

User avatar
Paul Osborne
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005 9:54 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Canterbury, Kent

Postby Paul Osborne » Tue 08 Aug 2006 8:43 am

jayuk wrote:That is cool!! One of the best pics ive seen post graft to be honest

What did you use to take it?.....


Thankyou.

A Casio Exilim EX-Z1000 - 10MP compact camera (around £250 if you shop around).

I bought it for the wife for her birthday as our old Fuji was old and big and this new one is "girly small" (to quote the wife) and fits nicely in her handbag - she is always snapping away. Anyway it occurred to me that being 10MP the macro mode does not need to be great it just needs to work and I guess the results speak for themselves.

User avatar
jayuk
Ambassador
Ambassador
Posts: 2148
Joined: Sun 21 Mar 2004 1:50 pm
Location: London / Manchester / Cheshire

Postby jayuk » Tue 08 Aug 2006 8:51 am

well thats def a good camera! im still on the hunt for one!...but that looks a good go-er! better investigate!

its kool that you can even make out the little knots as I had not seen them that much...and I just zoomed in as well and it still holds a good res!!
KC is about facing the challenges it creates rather than accepting the problems it generates -

(C) Copyright 2005 KP

User avatar
Andrew MacLean
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7703
Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other
Location: Scotland

Postby Andrew MacLean » Tue 08 Aug 2006 11:14 am

Paul

sounds good

Gareth

I am still on steroids 2 years and 8 months post graft, although I now use them only every second day.

andrew
Andrew MacLean

User avatar
Paul Osborne
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005 9:54 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Canterbury, Kent

Postby Paul Osborne » Tue 08 Aug 2006 11:21 am

GarethB wrote:It amazes me how long everyone is on the steroids post graft!

20 years ago I was only on them for 3 months, now it seems the going rate is at least 9!

Anyone know the reason why?


I guess that medical knowledge has advanced and that they feel there is a better chance of success with extended steroid usage. Unfortunately we dont have access to the stats and figures for rejection rates etc over the last 20 years so we can run our own analysis.

You may (dare I say it) be quite a rare specimen.

:-)

Paul

User avatar
Alison Fisher
Forum Stalwart
Forum Stalwart
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006 12:56 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
Location: Leicester

Postby Alison Fisher » Tue 08 Aug 2006 2:16 pm

That's a fantastic photo Paul. :D

I can't recall exactly how long I was putting drops in my eyes after my grafts but it wasn't for very long at all. If pushed I would have said two months tops. That things have changed explains a few things though. I always get asked if I'm putting any drops in on my hospital visits and get a slightly surprised/confused look when I say I haven't put any in for years and years, and I wonder why they ask me - especially as they have my notes in front of them! :lol:
grafts in 1992 and 1996


Return to “General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 124 guests