Any positive outcomes from this?
Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet
- John Smith
- Moderator
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Thu 08 Jan 2004 12:48 am
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
- Location: Sidcup, Kent
Re: Any positive outcomes from this?
I wasn't involved with this at the time, but I don't see such a thing at Moorfields when I visit.
John
- Bulls Eye
- Contributor
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat 29 Apr 2017 5:35 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Re: Any positive outcomes from this?
Presumably then sad outcome is it was negative.
-
- Forum Stalwart
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Mon 20 Apr 2009 9:04 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Re: Any positive outcomes from this?
Bullseye, I have directly spoken with Anne, and she did raise it with Moorfields but they didn't address it.
Disabled People Against Cuts (which includes people with visual impairment) have given evidence to the UN at Geneva this week because the Special Rappoteur reported last year on "grave and systemic violations" against disabled people in the UK especially regarding both in-work and out of work disability and sickness benefits. The sanctions regime and in-built waiting times of 6 weeks up to 12 weeks have caused record numbers of evictions and foodbank referrals. Likewise for people in receipt of Jobseekers Allowance. I continue to be concerned about this but I think it would need a multi-organisation (all eye charities) signed letters to eye hospital Trusts to ask them to address this for people on the lowest incomes ranging from £73, £56 a week to 0, and to collect hard data such as patients not using saline, refreshing soaking solutions daily, or leaving lens out because of the cost of solutions and saline. I think it would also be worth raising at events alongside the need for visual registration to take account of variable visual acuity which is most pertinent with KC which would be useful regarding work and education. Again, I think it needs a number of groups and big name charities to back this, but it might be worth patients of any hospital writing to raise the issues with your local eye hospitals. Individuals can exercise pressure too.
Disabled People Against Cuts (which includes people with visual impairment) have given evidence to the UN at Geneva this week because the Special Rappoteur reported last year on "grave and systemic violations" against disabled people in the UK especially regarding both in-work and out of work disability and sickness benefits. The sanctions regime and in-built waiting times of 6 weeks up to 12 weeks have caused record numbers of evictions and foodbank referrals. Likewise for people in receipt of Jobseekers Allowance. I continue to be concerned about this but I think it would need a multi-organisation (all eye charities) signed letters to eye hospital Trusts to ask them to address this for people on the lowest incomes ranging from £73, £56 a week to 0, and to collect hard data such as patients not using saline, refreshing soaking solutions daily, or leaving lens out because of the cost of solutions and saline. I think it would also be worth raising at events alongside the need for visual registration to take account of variable visual acuity which is most pertinent with KC which would be useful regarding work and education. Again, I think it needs a number of groups and big name charities to back this, but it might be worth patients of any hospital writing to raise the issues with your local eye hospitals. Individuals can exercise pressure too.
Return to “General Discussion Forum”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests