Lou
Can I take that as a sign of approval?
Vic
Sorry about the distraction. I know that this must be really scary for you, in the middle of your studies to have to cope with wonky eyes. How good is your vision now, with/without lenses or specs?
Andrew
Hello
Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet
- Andrew MacLean
- Moderator
- Posts: 7703
- Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Other
- Location: Scotland
- Louise Pembroke
- Champion
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 11:34 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Totally Andrew!
It really makes me mad that medical schools [and nursing schools] have come no further in supporting people with any health difficulties and seem all too keen to just dispose of anyone who doesn't possess perfect health. They should be looking at how to support you Vic, not just subjecting you to endless fit to practice assessments.
Grrr on your behalf
It really makes me mad that medical schools [and nursing schools] have come no further in supporting people with any health difficulties and seem all too keen to just dispose of anyone who doesn't possess perfect health. They should be looking at how to support you Vic, not just subjecting you to endless fit to practice assessments.
Grrr on your behalf
Director of Sci-Fi and Silliness and FRCC [Fellow of the Royal College of Cake]
- Vic
- Regular contributor
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat 01 Apr 2006 8:19 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and spectacles
- Location: Birmingham
My bilateral vision corrected with glasses, on a very good day, is 6/12. The ungrafted eye is about 6/36 corrected I think, although that's by medic self-diagnosis as I haven't seen my consultant for a while. Uncorrected, bilateral vision is about 6/60.
Part of my reason for wanting to change hospitals to Birmingham is that I am very rarely in Bristol these days, making appts difficult as it involves a whole day off and train journey etc - and also that Bristol seem to be hugely lacking in appointments right now, especially for optometry. When i tried lenses pre-graft, I had an unfortunate experience in which they ended up rubbing off the corneal epithelium (cue eye casualty visit). At which point, in retrospect probably a little prematurely, they gave up on lenses completely. I was on the verge of sitting A-levels at the time so the emphasis was on getting a quick-fix solution. But I think trying an RGP lens on the grafted eye may be the next step forward.
It's hugely frustrating to be constantly fighting the med school rather than feeling I have their backing. Unfortunately the GMC puts the onus on them to root out any students who won't meet FTP before qualifying, and I think they get their knuckles rapped if they don't. So they're very quick to get on the defensive side.
I'm really interested in medical ethics as well - very diverse and deep subject. Being hijacked by insurance companies is madness - unethical ethics?!
Vic
Part of my reason for wanting to change hospitals to Birmingham is that I am very rarely in Bristol these days, making appts difficult as it involves a whole day off and train journey etc - and also that Bristol seem to be hugely lacking in appointments right now, especially for optometry. When i tried lenses pre-graft, I had an unfortunate experience in which they ended up rubbing off the corneal epithelium (cue eye casualty visit). At which point, in retrospect probably a little prematurely, they gave up on lenses completely. I was on the verge of sitting A-levels at the time so the emphasis was on getting a quick-fix solution. But I think trying an RGP lens on the grafted eye may be the next step forward.
It's hugely frustrating to be constantly fighting the med school rather than feeling I have their backing. Unfortunately the GMC puts the onus on them to root out any students who won't meet FTP before qualifying, and I think they get their knuckles rapped if they don't. So they're very quick to get on the defensive side.
I'm really interested in medical ethics as well - very diverse and deep subject. Being hijacked by insurance companies is madness - unethical ethics?!
Vic
- Andrew MacLean
- Moderator
- Posts: 7703
- Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Other
- Location: Scotland
Vic wrote:It's hugely frustrating to be constantly fighting the med school rather than feeling I have their backing. Unfortunately the GMC puts the onus on them to root out any students who won't meet FTP before qualifying, and I think they get their knuckles rapped if they don't. So they're very quick to get on the defensive side.
I'm really interested in medical ethics as well - very diverse and deep subject. Being hijacked by insurance companies is madness - unethical ethics?!
Vic
Vic I can only guess what this must be like for you. Keep fighting! I look foreard to debating ethics with you on the forum.
Andrew
Andrew MacLean
- rosemary johnson
- Champion
- Posts: 1478
- Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004 8:42 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Contact lenses
- Location: East London, UK
One woudl like to think that insurance companies would want to make sure the medics they insured were practising ethically. And play a part, maybe, preventing unethical practices.
That's long way from defining "unethical" as "what we don't insure".
the question of it not being ethical to practise without insurance is another issue again.
grrrr.
Vic, have you ever thought of tryng scleral lenses? I know they look horrendous the first time you see them, but if corneal lenses rubbed the surface off the cornea, then a lens that clears the front part of the cornea that you look out might be worth a try.
(in my personal, non-medically-qualified scleral lens wearer opinion, of course!)
Rosemary
That's long way from defining "unethical" as "what we don't insure".
the question of it not being ethical to practise without insurance is another issue again.
grrrr.
Vic, have you ever thought of tryng scleral lenses? I know they look horrendous the first time you see them, but if corneal lenses rubbed the surface off the cornea, then a lens that clears the front part of the cornea that you look out might be worth a try.
(in my personal, non-medically-qualified scleral lens wearer opinion, of course!)
Rosemary
- Andrew MacLean
- Moderator
- Posts: 7703
- Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Other
- Location: Scotland
You have hit it right on the head, Rosemary. It may even be irresponsible to pracitce without insurance in the modern world, just as no one would think of driving without insurance, so in sutiatuons where there is a potential for great harm it is right that p[ractitioners carry appropriate indurance.
But, I agree with you that for an insurance company to say that this or that procedure is not what they cover is not the same as this or that procedure is not ethically supportable.
Andrew
But, I agree with you that for an insurance company to say that this or that procedure is not what they cover is not the same as this or that procedure is not ethically supportable.
Andrew
Andrew MacLean
- Andrew MacLean
- Moderator
- Posts: 7703
- Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Other
- Location: Scotland
- Louise Pembroke
- Champion
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004 11:34 pm
- Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
- Vision: Graft(s) and contact lenses
Return to “General Discussion Forum”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests