One intac ring better than two?

General forum for the UK Keratoconus and self-help group members.

Click on the forum name, General Discussion Forum, above.

Moderators: Anne Klepacz, John Smith, Sweet

User avatar
Lynn White
Optometrist
Optometrist
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

One intac ring better than two?

Postby Lynn White » Thu 06 Sep 2007 10:41 pm

Just came across this interesting snippet...

http://www.osnsupersite.com/view.asp?rID=23456

User avatar
Karl R
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005 9:43 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: I have Intacs implanted
Location: Staffordshire

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Karl R » Fri 07 Sep 2007 5:45 am

Interesting.

Could be a way forward in the treatment of KC, but needs further study with a larger patient sample, a closer mean age between the two groups and over a longer period of time.
There is only one difference between a madman and me. The madman thinks he is sane. I know I am mad. (Salvador Dali 1904-1989)

User avatar
Andrew MacLean
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7703
Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other
Location: Scotland

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Andrew MacLean » Fri 07 Sep 2007 9:38 am

I was going to post that self same link!

Lynne, what do you make of this?

Andrew
Andrew MacLean

User avatar
Eddie S
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006 1:00 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: I have Intacs implanted
Location: Leicester

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Eddie S » Fri 07 Sep 2007 10:44 am

I suppose it would cut waiting lists, only having to one 'part' rather than two :D
Eddie
Somebody complimented me on my driving yesterday - they left a note on my windscreen "Parking Fine" which was nice.
KC managed with softperm lens in left eye, Intacs (2/11/07) in right eye

User avatar
Ali Akay
Optometrist
Optometrist
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005 9:50 pm
Keratoconus: No, I don't suffer from KC
Vision: I don't have KC
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Ali Akay » Fri 07 Sep 2007 12:16 pm

Thanks for this interesting post Lynne. I think there's some merit in it, and I guess the concept is not dissimilar to the controversial mini ARK procedure (ARK= assymmetric radial keratectomy where partial thickness radial cuts are made in the steeper sections of the cornea to cause flattening). Unless the cone was central which is rare, cornea is almost always much steeper inferiorly than superiorly, hence probably not much point inserting an intac superiorly anyway. I remember the analogy of a "sagging boob" has been used on this site before to describe a cone, and if we take this one step further, perhaps an intac inferiorly would be like an underwired bra!!

User avatar
Lynn White
Optometrist
Optometrist
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Lynn White » Sat 08 Sep 2007 5:59 am

OKay Ali - you have done it now! I won't be able to think of this now without visions of underwired bras!

Andrew... what I think is that possibly the one intac ring inferiorly is helping to reduce higher order aberrations. other words, where the cone is steeper inferiorly (which is the majority of cones, as Ali says) then the regularizing effect of the ring may help to reduce distortion inferiorly. One would have to look at the aberrations before and after on an aberrometer.

The guys reporting on Intacs at the conference pointed out that the major improvement from their point of view was the reduction in coma (the aberration that makes everything doubly and streaky) so perhaps this is why. I'll try and contact the Dr and find out!

User avatar
Andrew MacLean
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7703
Joined: Thu 15 Jan 2004 8:01 pm
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: Other
Location: Scotland

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Andrew MacLean » Sat 08 Sep 2007 8:31 am

:D

As you know, I have always been an admirer of a well placed metaphor. However, not even I would ever have thought of calling INTACS a kind of eye-bra.

That, however is what this procedure will forevr be; thank you Ali. Seriously, this has to be of interest to us all. Thanks Lynne.

Andrew
Andrew MacLean

User avatar
Sajeev
Forum Stalwart
Forum Stalwart
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu 18 Mar 2004 10:56 pm
Location: London

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Sajeev » Sun 09 Sep 2007 2:37 am

Is the use of the under-wire to create flattening? not so, me thinks...

User avatar
Lynn White
Optometrist
Optometrist
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Lynn White » Mon 10 Sep 2007 7:20 am

While we are on the subject of visual imagery... I have an admission....

I'm really sorry Ali... but your country icon reminds me of a fried egg with a bit of garnish. Every time I see it I think "Oh, there's the egg and bacon brekky so its must be Ali"....

Not heard anything back yet but will keep you posted..

User avatar
Karl R
Chatterbox
Chatterbox
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005 9:43 am
Keratoconus: Yes, I have KC
Vision: I have Intacs implanted
Location: Staffordshire

Re: One intac ring better than two?

Postby Karl R » Mon 10 Sep 2007 7:49 am

Ali Akay wrote: I remember the analogy of a "sagging boob" has been used on this site before to describe a cone, and if we take this one step further, perhaps an intac inferiorly would be like an underwired bra!!


ImageImage

Picks himself up off the floor.

Are INTACS now to be measured in cup size????? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
There is only one difference between a madman and me. The madman thinks he is sane. I know I am mad. (Salvador Dali 1904-1989)


Return to “General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests